Ok, let's do it then.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> 2018-03-23 21:22 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > Hi guys, > > seems there is no -1 so any objection to create the repo next week? > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > 2018-03-19 8:29 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > >> +1 to host jwt-auth @G whatever tomee does. >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >> >> 2018-03-19 4:09 GMT+01:00 David Blevins <[email protected]>: >> >>> Ah. My intention was a +1 would mean "We should create new JWT module >>> in Geronimo now, regardless of what TomEE is discussing." >>> >>> Not "can we ever" in a general sense, but should we do it right now. >>> >>> If someone would like to wait a bit longer, they should not vote +1. It >>> could still happen later of course. >>> >>> >>> -David >>> >>> > On Mar 18, 2018, at 7:32 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Just to make sure I understand. a +1 on this to me means there may be >>> a module created in geronimo. Maybe not. But either way it shouldn't stop >>> what TomEE is doing. >>> > >>> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 8:59 PM David Blevins <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > My vote would be -0 and I hesitate even for a negative anything. >>> > >>> > I think the "Geronimo will do it anyway, collaborate or not" >>> perspective feels a bit like an ultimatum. That said, if people truly do >>> want to move on regardless of what happens in TomEE, that's exactly what >>> should happen. >>> > >>> > I feel strongly that a project should not be obstructed by other >>> projects who feel ownership over an domain, be forced to collaborate, or >>> otherwise be stopped in their tracks. >>> > >>> > Here's how I'd like my vote read: >>> > >>> > - Waiting to see what TomEE decides or creates would be ideal in my >>> mind, but not necessary if there is support for moving forward >>> > >>> > - I wouldn't help, but I wouldn't stand in the way >>> > >>> > - I continue to have reservations naming reusable components after a >>> dead app server. I managed to have all my best efforts remain perfectly >>> invisible under the name "OpenEJB" and "EJB." If people want to put effort >>> into reforming the 15 year-old Geronimo brand, they are welcome to do so, >>> but I can't sign up for that again. I can't pretend this isn't a >>> significant obstacle. >>> > >>> > - I continue to feel we'd be stronger together (TomEE and Geronimo). >>> With these false lines making everyone have to get commit twice and hiding >>> our best work under a dead website and brand, we aren't getting the >>> strength and speed we need. >>> > >>> > >>> > As long as I feel understood, not pushed into doing something I don't >>> want to do, I'm more than happy. >>> > >>> > >>> > -David >>> > >>> > > On Mar 18, 2018, at 5:05 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Two votes are up in the TomEE community on what to do with PR #123 ( >>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/123 ). The first vote is if TomEE >>> should merge it. The second vote is if TomEE should attempt to extract it. >>> > > >>> > > It was said 3-4 times in the discussion between both communities >>> "geronimo will have a jwt-auth impl." This is absolutely ok, there is no >>> rule that two projects cannot do the same or similar thing. Apache Tamaya >>> exists and there is a Geronimo Config, both aim at MicroProfile Config >>> compliance. This is OK by ASF standards and one community is not judged >>> good or bad for choosing to also implement something. >>> > > >>> > > That said, decisions like this should be made by the project >>> clearly. Some people may want to move ahead now. Some people may want to >>> wait and see how things go with TomEE. >>> > > >>> > > Vote: Move ahead with creating a reusable JWT module >>> > > >>> > > +1 Let's get on this, now. There may be two impls, but that's ok. >>> > > -+0 >>> > > -1 Let's wait / maybe later / other >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -David >>> > > >>> > >>> >>> >> >
