Dont think there is much risk and worse case we can still use svn, right? Le sam. 2 juin 2018 19:26, John D. Ament <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Ok, per infra they usually just make the mirror the canonical source when > we do a SVN to git migration and there's already a git mirror in place. > > Do we want to wait for after the coming release to do the conversion? > > John > > On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 12:54 PM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Great. Thanks John. >> >> Le sam. 2 juin 2018 à 12:32, John D. Ament <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> >>> Actually we already discussed it in the past, but slipped through my >>> hands due to busy-ness [1]. >>> >>> I'll submit the request now, since we'll need to reset the mirror needs >>> an infra ticket. >>> >>> [1]: >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4898f1bbd990dd94554bbf20ff569cdbb9ae3c0a23e88e5e2f2c233e@%3Cdev.geronimo.apache.org%3E >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 11:43 AM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Applying patches submitted to github is a pain. Of course, it's doable, >>>> but it adds delays and extra steps we could avoid. >>>> For instance, I have checked out the PR from Dany. Need to create a >>>> diff file. >>>> >>>> Then need to checkout the SVN tree, and apply the diff file and commit. >>>> >>>> We could have simply push the PR straight into the Apache Git repo and >>>> that's done. >>>> >>>> So wondering if there would be any interests in moving the code to >>>> GITBOX instead? >>>> >>>> I'm happy to request a repo and do the switch if you wish. >>>> >>>> Jean-Louis >>>> >>>
