Was there any vote?

Can you call a vote plz?

LieGrue,
strub

> Am 02.06.2018 um 22:50 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>:
> 
> How long has the vote been up for?
> 
> Le samedi 2 juin 2018, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Dont think there is much risk and worse case we can still use svn, right?
> 
> Le sam. 2 juin 2018 19:26, John D. Ament <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Ok, per infra they usually just make the mirror the canonical source when we 
> do a SVN to git migration and there's already a git mirror in place.
> 
> Do we want to wait for after the coming release to do the conversion?
> 
> John
> 
> On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 12:54 PM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Great. Thanks John.
> 
> Le sam. 2 juin 2018 à 12:32, John D. Ament <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Actually we already discussed it in the past, but slipped through my hands 
> due to busy-ness [1].
> 
> I'll submit the request now, since we'll need to reset the mirror needs an 
> infra ticket.
> 
> [1]: 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4898f1bbd990dd94554bbf20ff569cdbb9ae3c0a23e88e5e2f2c233e@%3Cdev.geronimo.apache.org%3E
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 11:43 AM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Applying patches submitted to github is a pain. Of course, it's doable, but 
> it adds delays and extra steps we could avoid.
> For instance, I have checked out the PR from Dany. Need to create a diff file.
> 
> Then need to checkout the SVN tree, and apply the diff file and commit.
> 
> We could have simply push the PR straight into the Apache Git repo and that's 
> done.
> 
> So wondering if there would be any interests in moving the code to GITBOX 
> instead?
> 
> I'm happy to request a repo and do the switch if you wish.
> 
> Jean-Louis
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Louis

Reply via email to