Ok, but that indicates we don't know if this is portable right? On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 11:28 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi John, > > Meecrowave and OWB (this one just set until next Meecrowave is upgraded > due to an OWB bug) are in scope *test*. > There is nothing linked to them in the impl and got some feedback it works > on any server implementing CDI (AFAIK it runs on weld and TomEE 8 OOTB, > didnt test others). > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le dim. 3 juin 2018 à 17:23, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> a > écrit : > >> I saw that the JWT Auth project only uses OWB and Meecrowave. It does >> not have tests against Weld, which makes me think its not portable. Why is >> it a part of Geronimo then? >> >
