Not voting negatively but seems we broke normalizeMimeTypeParameter (I guess copying the RI?) and I'm not sure it should be done. >From my understanding this part is not well specified and highly depends on the impl but I don't see a reson to break existing consumers which I always favor in regards of being aligned on the RI.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mar. 24 mai 2022 à 11:45, Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> a écrit : > Here we go > > We now pass all TCK and signature tests. Thanks Richard. > > This is essentially the same as the M1 David did last week but with the > fixes for compliance (See GERONIMO-6832) > > Here is the link for sources > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/activation_2.0_spec/ > > Here is the svn tag > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-activation_2.0_spec-1.0.0/ > > Here is the staging repo > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1155 > > Please vote to approve this release: > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Abstain (please provide specific comments) > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks > > > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com >
