> On May 24, 2022, at 6:14 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You could have flags that enabled non-compliant behavior, but they would have > to be off by default and require user action to turn them on.
To be clear I could have used a better word than "flags." You can have any means you like to enable non-compliant behavior such as annotations, alternate jars, etc. Anything that must be done explicitly by a user to put themselves knowingly in a non-compliant state. -David
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
