Thanks for your feedback Romain, but if you read carefully what I wrote, I
exactly suggested doing the adoption process before doing any retirement.

I'm glad you agree with that part.

Ray

On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 1:00 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Raymond,
>
> Guess before retiring we should find a home for all residents (Geronimo by
> itself is not dead and we have several subprojects which should stay
> somewhere) so -1 as of today even if I agree with most of what you said and
> the high level idea behind.
>
> My blind guess is that we should at least await october for such a work
> since it will be summer holidays then september rush but we should probably
> plan to tackle that topic at that time - can be a board report point
> thinking out loud.
>
> Hope it makes sense.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le lun. 11 juil. 2022 à 18:52, Raymond Augé <raymond.a...@liferay.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> The "Geronimo" project is getting long in the tooth and has very few
>> maintainers. It's been teetering on the edge of what could be considered
>> active ever since I've been involved (I believe more than 5 years now.)
>>
>> The project has seen many parts of its portfolio go unmaintained or
>> deprecated. We've seen other projects adopt parts (with this project's
>> blessing [1]). I would also argue this project seems to have lost its
>> identity and is now some sort of mishmash of libraries and utilities with
>> barely related aspects which I don't believe is really the model for a good
>> Open Source Apache project to bank a future on.
>>
>> And now, we really should make an effort to settle the issue of
>> "Native"-themed mascotry which was raised again most recently here [2].
>>
>> PROPOSAL:
>> I would like to propose we attempt to find any other ASF projects that
>> would be willing to take over interesting parts of the portfolio. After
>> that is exhausted, if nothing significant of interest remains the project
>> could simply be retired. However, if something significant does remain and
>> someone speaks up about wanting to maintain it, they could initiate a new
>> ASF project to house the remaining parts and have the new project adopt
>> those interesting bits.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Ray
>>
>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/sdny91l920o2lnl58sj5wy577k39fhsz
>> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/bd8s3knj2541275rbdnx2718h0y8qhrj
>>
>>

-- 
*Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* (@Liferay)
OSGi Fellow, Java Champion

Reply via email to