I think there is a tag for it.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Avery Ching <[email protected]> wrote: > Isn't there a branch-0.1? I see it in my git. > > > On 3/29/13 5:29 PM, Eli Reisman wrote: > >> Avery, you know where our 0.1 release branch went to? >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Avery Ching <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> So the tricky part is that you have to be careful about how you push to >>> our git repo, or else you create a new remote branch automatically. >>> >>> Here's how I do it. >>> >>> git push origin <local branch name>:trunk >>> >>> I'm sure there are other ways, but if you forget ":trunk", hello new >>> branch! >>> >>> Avery >>> >>> >>> On 3/28/13 3:16 PM, Eli Reisman wrote: >>> >>> Hey folks, >>>> >>>> I notice on the branches of our git repo, we have a bunch of wierd temp >>>> branches again (were those commits meant for trunk? did they get into >>>> trunk?) and we are now missing or 0.1 release branch. >>>> >>>> Is all this intentional? Whats the deal with the new branches? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Eli >>>> >>>> >>>> >
