I'll check again, didn't see one that night, there was a 0.1 branch before that showed up with git branch -a
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Nitay <[email protected]> wrote: > I think there is a tag for it. > > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Avery Ching <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Isn't there a branch-0.1? I see it in my git. > > > > > > On 3/29/13 5:29 PM, Eli Reisman wrote: > > > >> Avery, you know where our 0.1 release branch went to? > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Avery Ching <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> So the tricky part is that you have to be careful about how you push to > >>> our git repo, or else you create a new remote branch automatically. > >>> > >>> Here's how I do it. > >>> > >>> git push origin <local branch name>:trunk > >>> > >>> I'm sure there are other ways, but if you forget ":trunk", hello new > >>> branch! > >>> > >>> Avery > >>> > >>> > >>> On 3/28/13 3:16 PM, Eli Reisman wrote: > >>> > >>> Hey folks, > >>>> > >>>> I notice on the branches of our git repo, we have a bunch of wierd > temp > >>>> branches again (were those commits meant for trunk? did they get into > >>>> trunk?) and we are now missing or 0.1 release branch. > >>>> > >>>> Is all this intentional? Whats the deal with the new branches? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> Eli > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > >
