If someone gets a chance please review. It turned out to be a little easier then i thought:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-gossip/compare/master...edwardcapriolo: GOSSIP-22?expand=1 Leveraging the code here: https://github.com/arosien/failure I attempted to contact the author of failure (ASF V2) to see if he wants to contribute the code. (not in maven) We have other options like fork and package etc. Lets hold off the merge of this until after the release. Thanks, Edward On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:42 PM, chandresh pancholi < chandreshpancholi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I will also look into it. > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > This seems interesting and low bar to entry: > > > > https://github.com/arosien/failure > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I was doing some load testing and I found the the current gating factor > > > for max instances running in the same JVM is limited by the JMX based > > > notification system the failure detector uses. > > > > > > Currently a cluster of N requires N * (N-1) JMX notification threads. I > > > started attempting to remove this limit without going into building the > > > accrual failure detector (22) but there were some nuanced bugs and I > > backed > > > off because it did not seem worth the change. > > > > > > If anyone has an literature to contribute about building a consensus > > based > > > failure detector please discuss. Once we cut this release that is > likely > > > were I will spent my attention. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Edward > > > > > > > > > -- > Chandresh Pancholi > Senior Software Engineer > Flipkart.com > Email-id:chandresh.panch...@flipkart.com > Contact:08951803660 >
