[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOSSIP-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16137785#comment-16137785 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on GOSSIP-41: -------------------------------------- Github user edwardcapriolo commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-gossip/pull/68#discussion_r134644785 --- Diff: gossip-base/src/main/java/org/apache/gossip/manager/handlers/MessageHandlerFactory.java --- @@ -35,8 +30,8 @@ public static MessageHandler defaultHandler() { return concurrentHandler( new TypedMessageHandler(Response.class, new ResponseHandler()), new TypedMessageHandler(ShutdownMessage.class, new ShutdownMessageHandler()), - new TypedMessageHandler(PerNodeDataMessage.class, new PerNodeDataMessageHandler()), --- End diff -- Lets not remove the old system. Eventually I think the bulk only way makes sense but there is no issue in supporting both in the code and choosing with a switch > Transfer gossip data in bulk > ---------------------------- > > Key: GOSSIP-41 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOSSIP-41 > Project: Gossip > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Edward Capriolo > Assignee: Pooya Salehi > > Currently the process that transfers shared data and per node data iterates a > map transmitting a single datum at a time using one way communication. We > could transmit more key values at once by simply saying if keys < 100 > transfer all at once, or by collecting keys and sending in groups of 100. > This would greatly lower chatter communicating data. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)