btw, if we don't have more than 3 BINDING +1s, we cannot conclude a vote as
passed.

Best Regards,
Yu


On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 at 17:02, Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:

> For vote on IPMC, only IPMC member vote is binding. For vote on dev
> mailing list of the project, PPMC member vote is binding.
>
> Referring to the incubation release policy [1]: "When a Podling decides it
> wants to make an ASF release, the Podling MUST hold a vote on their public
> dev list. At least *three +1 PPMC votes* are required (see the Apache
> Voting Process page) and more +1 votes than -1 votes. If the vote passes,
> the Podling MUST send a summary of that vote to the Incubator’s general
> list and request that the Incubator PMC approve the release. Three +1
> Incubator PMC votes are required to approve a release".
>
> Since this is a release vote, we should refer to the relative document in
> the right context.
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#releases
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 at 14:34, Weibin Zeng <wei...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Yu Li,
>> the update of vote result is base on the suggestion of Calvin[1] that
>> only the vote from incubator PMC members can be a binding vote for a
>> incubator project, so the vote can be carried to incubator list vote
>> directly.
>> But I found some incubator projects like fury[2], hertzbeat[3] take PPMC
>> members' vote as binding too in dev list vote.
>> So i am a bit confused, which way is correct?
>>
>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/vonb5ppx9kdsrx7p4crjrwp428mfp67q
>> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/kof226qkft02jcj62kt6wnppdnm2jgzx
>> [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/pdo6fjr43z70dqtq9zsd15omqj2qqpgh
>>
>>
>> On 2024/06/14 06:06:28 Yu Li wrote:
>> > To make it clear, I think the vote result here is passing with 5
>> > binding +1s and 1 non-binding +1, as posted originally.
>> >
>> > Thanks all for the efforts.
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Yu
>> >
>> > On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 at 12:59, Weibin Zeng <wei...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for your reminding. I have raised another vote in incubator
>> list[1]
>> > >
>> > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/nvn5tr2wb7bd8xjw2tqocxjpzx8j03s4
>> > >
>> > > On 2024/06/13 10:13:04 Yu Li wrote:
>> > > > For incubator projects, release requires a vote from inside the
>> > > > project and then another one from the IPMC [1]. Since this is the
>> > > > first phase, +1 from any PPMC member is binding.
>> > > >
>> > > > After the vote passes, we need to raise another one on the IPMC.
>> > > >
>> > > > Best Regards,
>> > > > Yu
>> > > >
>> > > > [1] https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#releases
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 16:59, Weibin Zeng <wei...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Sorry for the misunderstanding of vote binding, according to [1],
>> only vote from IPMC member can be binding.
>> > > > > So the result of the vote should updated to 1 +1 binding and 5 +1
>> non-binding:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Binding votes:
>> > > > > - Calvin Kirs
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Non-binding votes:
>> > > > > - Sem
>> > > > > - Zhe Wang
>> > > > > - LiXue
>> > > > > - Ye Cao
>> > > > > - Weibin Zeng
>> > > > >
>> > > > > [1]
>> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html#ppmc_and_binding_votes
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Best,
>> > > > > Weibin Zeng
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 2024/06/13 07:32:40 Weibin Zeng wrote:
>> > > > > > Hello, Apache GraphAr(incubating) Community, The vote to
>> release Apache
>> > > > > > GraphAr(Incubating) v0.12.0-rc.1 has passed. The vote PASSED
>> with 5 binding
>> > > > > > +1 and 0 -1 vote: Binding votes:
>> > > > > > - Calvin Kirs
>> > > > > > - Sem
>> > > > > > - Zhe Wang
>> > > > > > - LiXue
>> > > > > > - Weibin Zeng
>> > > > > >   No-binding votes: - Ye Cao Vote thread:
>> > > > > >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/5vhztjjqqzljt5j9rb8w869tsny39sj7
>> > > > > >   Best, Weibin Zeng
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@graphar.apache.org
>> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@graphar.apache.org
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@graphar.apache.org
>> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@graphar.apache.org
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@graphar.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@graphar.apache.org
>> > >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@graphar.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@graphar.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@graphar.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@graphar.apache.org
>>
>>

Reply via email to