+1(binding) for ASF Confluence. It seems that Confluence is more popular ASF projects.
发件人: roryqi <ror...@apache.org> 日期: 星期一, 2024年8月19日 20:30 收件人: dev@gravitino.apache.org <dev@gravitino.apache.org> 主题: Re: Enable the Github wiki or ASF confluence? After surveying on many Apache projects, only Superset uses Github wiki. Its wiki only shows simple information. ASF Confluence is adopted by many projects. It seems more formal. +1 (non-binding) for ASF Confluence. Rory Minghuang Li <mcha...@apache.org> 于2024年8月19日周一 19:11写道： > Hi Jerry, > > Thank you for bringing this up. I fully support establishing a hub for > developer and community > documentation. > > ASF Confluence is preferable due to its richer features, despite GitHub > wiki's proximity to our > codebase. > > I endorse moving forward with Confluence for better document management. > > Best regards, > Minghuang Li > > On 2024/08/19 10:15:18 Saisai Shao wrote: > > Hi team, > > > > Currently, we have user-facing docs for users, but we're lacking > > developer-facing docs for developers. By investigating other projects, > they > > typically use Github wiki or ASF confluence for developer/community > related > > things. > > > > So here are two questions: > > > > 1. Shall we have a developer/community face document hub to manage all > the > > docs? > > 2. If so, what is your preference, Github wiki or ASF confluence? > > > > Best, > > Jerry > > >
