Do we roughly know current adoption numbers / artifact downloads, and understand what would improve it? I feel community activity (both conversations and contributions) are in strong relationship with usefulness of the project, and if there are any adoption blockers we should identify those and fix to avoid stagnation. Did anything change with competition in OSS and closed source space in data quality area?
I don't work in data space for a few years now, but it is sad to see engagement going down. On Fri, Jan 19, 2024, 4:54 PM William Guo <gu...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > As we're aware, community activity has been on the lower side lately. > However, in the ever-evolving landscape of AI, ensuring high-quality data > is crucial. We aim to enhance Griffin to be versatile and well-suited for > the demands of this emerging AI era. > > I'm reaching out for your thoughts and ideas on data quality features, also > how to improve community activities. How can we further refine Griffin to > meet the requirements of robust and high-quality data in the realm of AI? > Your insights are highly valued. > > Thank you, William >
