I suspect this is intentional but was before my time. Try this also:
int triggered = 0
def o1 = { -> triggered++ }
def o2 = { println '*' + it; triggered++ }
println(o1) // ConsoleScript11$_run_closure1@xxxxxxxx
println(o2) // ConsoleScript11$_run_closure2@yyyyyyyy
assert triggered == 0
println("xyzzy$o1") // xyzzy0
assert triggered == 1
println("XX${o2}YY${o2(42)}ZZ") // *42\n*XX\nXXYY1ZZ
assert triggered == 3
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Nathan Harvey <nathanwhar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Take the following code:
>
> int triggered = 0
> def o = { -> triggered++ }
>
> println(o) // A
> println("$o") // B
> println("${o}") // C
>
> After A, triggered is 0; after B, it's 1; after C, it's 2. The Closure is
> being called and the result of it is being printed instead. Is this
> behavior
> intended?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
>
