Fair point, Jochen. On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> wrote:
> On 03.01.2018 07:44, Guillaume Laforge wrote: > [...] > >> We can still discuss the syntax, but I'd be interested in seeing one. >> Although you can start experimenting with an AST transformation. >> >> On principle, I think I'm in favor of the idea, but as Paul said in >> another thread, the devil is always in the details! >> > > An AST transformation is not going to be enough for a full dynamic > version. Just look at the continuous problems we have with static imports. > The transform can then not be more as a simple showcase with a naive > implementation. The actual implementation will differ - a lot. > > bye Jochen > -- Guillaume Laforge Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+ <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>
