On 05.09.25 18:10, OCsite wrote:
[...]
===
def foo // [1]
...
for (def foo in ....) // would not use [1], would scope a new variable
instead
for (foo in ...) // would use [1]
===
If you are cosy with breaking backward compatibility, well, you should
do /this/ change, not /that/ one which breaks it for no benefit at all.
the first for-loop must not compile because it would invalidate how
local variable scoping works in general: we do no allow shadowing of
local variables, every local variable name must be unique!
But that is besides the point of if the for-loop spawns a new local
scope or not.
bye Jochen
