It's worth noting that Grails 3 doesn't need any particular IDE support apart from the Gradle one. So it should be compatible with the Community Edition AFAIK.
As for maintaining Groovy Eclipse (not GGTS), we should really try to find a new team capable of handling this. It is basically a set of patches applied on the Groovy compiler (that cannot be integrated into the normal compiler for a lot of different reasons), and it needs a good knowledge of Eclipse. Once we find those people (that's a call!), I know that the current Groovy Eclipse maintainers at Pivotal are willing to help to transfer knowledge. 2015-04-06 16:43 GMT+02:00 David Dawson <[email protected]>: > This is of course true. > > Unfortunately though, Grails support is not in the community edition, which > is where the majority of requests to us on which IDE to pick come from ... > I should probably have been clearer, as this is where GGTS tends to get > it's users from, in my experience. > > It might be nice to have somewhere/ somehow to think about the IDE > integrations for the broader groovy community. Not sure if that's something > you want to have related to the Groovy project at apache, but it seems like > a natural place. > > Some obvious place to add, for example, explicit Ratpack, gpars, Geb (etc) > support into IDEs. > > David. > > > On 6 April 2015 at 15:36, Guillaume Laforge <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi David, > > > > That would be nice if some Eclipse savvy people were able to pick up > where > > Pivotal left. > > AFAIK Pivotal should continue a bit on the Groovy Eclipse plugin as it's > > required for Spring Boot, but to a minimal extent. But GGTS will be > > completely discontinued. > > > > Back on IntelliJ IDEA though, the Groovy support is part of the free > > Community Edition, so it's as free as Eclipse can be, and it's even Open > > Source. > > > > Guillaume > > > > 2015-04-06 16:13 GMT+02:00 David Dawson < > [email protected] > > >: > > > > > Hiya, > > > > > > I'm an intellij user. > > > > > > Many of the companies and individuals we work with, however, can't > > justify > > > the cost of the ide, and so generally use GGTS as was. > > > > > > This has been moribund for quite a while, and is obviously now not > going > > to > > > be continued in its current form. > > > > > > I'm wondering, has there been any discussion about eclipse support for > > the > > > broader groovy ecosystem going forward? > > > > > > David. > > > > > > -- > > > David Dawson > > > CEO > > > Simplicity Itself Limited > > > Tel +44 7866 011 256 > > > Skype: davidadawson > > > [email protected] > > > http://www.simplicityitself.com > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Guillaume Laforge > > Groovy Project Manager > > Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet <http://restlet.com> > > > > Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ > > Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+ > > <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts> > > > > > > -- > David Dawson > CEO > Simplicity Itself Limited > Tel +44 7866 011 256 > Skype: davidadawson > [email protected] > http://www.simplicityitself.com >
