> -----Original Message----- > From: Guillaume Laforge [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 11:53 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: New Workflow… > > A subvers(ive|ion) mentality? :-)
Briefly, from a lurker's point of view, I would guess this refers to a perception that some people want a process that is not quite like a "distributed version control system". A DVCS allows for a great deal of flexibility by its nature, but the reality is that real projects need to have a "master" both in data model and process. You should "think git" when it makes sense, but think like Subversion (ironically, in that sense) for your "code of record". > 2015-04-19 15:07 GMT+02:00 Russel Winder <[email protected]>: > > > On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 19:25 +0200, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > > > […] > > > > > > > > We just have to merge pull request by hand into our local > copy of > > > > the > > > > apache repository and then push to the apache repo. From > there the > > > > changes will be mirrored to github. > > > > > > So for non-commiters the workflow is the same as before. Just > the > > > person > > > merging the pull request has to do bit more work. > > > > This seems, well, insane. Why can't the merging all happen on > GitHub, > > with the Apache mainline actually being a mirror of the GitHub > one, > > even though the Apache mainline is the official definition of the > > project. > > -- > > Russel. > > > > > =================================================================== > ========== > > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: > > sip:[email protected] > > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: > [email protected] > > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder > > > > > > -- > Guillaume Laforge > Groovy Project Manager > Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet <http://restlet.com> > > Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ > Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+ > <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>
