I'm working on getting Gerrit going here. Until then, all commits must be made to the ASF repo - we have legal requirements around traceability, push logs, etc that, as of now, GitHub can't satisfy, so all ASF projects are required to push all commits directly to the ASF-hosted repositories.
A. On Apr 19, 2015 12:42, "Guillaume Laforge" <[email protected]> wrote: > But that's what Russel would like :-) > > 2015-04-19 21:15 GMT+02:00 Jochen Theodorou <[email protected]>: > > > Am 19.04.2015 15:07, schrieb Russel Winder: > > > >> On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 19:25 +0200, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > >> > >>> […] > >>> > >>>> > >>>> We just have to merge pull request by hand into our local copy of > >>>> the > >>>> apache repository and then push to the apache repo. From there the > >>>> changes will be mirrored to github. > >>>> > >>> > >>> So for non-commiters the workflow is the same as before. Just the > >>> person > >>> merging the pull request has to do bit more work. > >>> > >> > >> This seems, well, insane. Why can't the merging all happen on GitHub, > >> with the Apache mainline actually being a mirror of the GitHub one, > >> even though the Apache mainline is the official definition of the > >> project. > >> > > > > I think there is a small mistake. The Github repo is a mirror of the > > apache one, not the other way around. So if you merged on github, you > would > > merge on the mirror. > > > > bye blackdrag > > > > -- > > Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou > > blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > -- > Guillaume Laforge > Groovy Project Manager > Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet <http://restlet.com> > > Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ > Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+ > <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts> >
