On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Guillaume Laforge <[email protected]> wrote: > ...it's painful, time-consuming, boring, etc... but we might be able to > get the 20 or so folks who contributed the docs to agree to relicense...
It's boring work indeed but probably better in the long term. > ...the CC-SA 3.0 is not a viral license like (L)GPL can be, it's just about > the documentation, it's not saying anything about the code base which has > nothing to do with the documentation... Absolutely, so another option is to avoid including docs in the code release (I haven't checked if they are currently included) and keep the docs well separated while this is being sorted out. -Bertrand
