Am 24.07.2015 02:21, schrieb Keegan Witt:
I noticed when looking at a package summary, all I can see is "Licensed
to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more contributor
license agreements." as the description for every class. For example,
see here:
http://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/gapi/groovy/lang/package-summary.html
Have we discussed addressing this already? Or should I open a
documentation Jira? Also, are we considering creating package-info.html
/ package-info.java files?
I think I see actually 2 kinds of bugs here.
If you look for example at
http://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/gapi/groovy/lang/AdaptingMetaClass.html
you see the license again. This is a comment above the package statement
and should not have been used instead of the javadoc comment above the
class statement.
And of course the problem of package-info.html being ignored.
groovy/lang for example has one, but I don't see anything from it in the
summary.
bye blackdrag
--
Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou
blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/
