Am 24.07.2015 14:23, schrieb Paul King:
[...]
If you replace latest with next in the url, you'll see the same problem
isn't there. We had briefly the header comment accidentally having /**
at the beginning instead of /*.
but should that really matter? They are not in the right place to count
as javadoc for the class. Is that a... what was it again? qdoc? A bug in
qdoc?
Also, are we considering creating package-info.html /
package-info.java files?
We have some package.html files but not many package-info.groovy (or
Java) files.
but aren't the package-info.html files ignored too? I mean their content
is supposed to how up on
http://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/gapi/groovy/lang/package-summary.html
as well, or not? groovy/lang has a package-info.html file.
At one point such files caused problems for Grails (was it
Tomcat's classloader having issues with classnames containing hyphens?).
I think we excluded/disabled some part of our package-info support. So
it might be easy to re-enable but we'll need to test with Grails.
there was something, yes.... don't remember the details though atm.
bye blackdrag
--
Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou
blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/
