Le 22/10/15 13:45, Emmanuel Lécharny a écrit : > Le 22/10/15 12:23, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit : >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Guillaume Laforge <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> ...charged with the evolution and maintenance of the Groovy programming >>> language project, to enable developers to develop programs in Groovy as an >>> alternative and complementary approach to using the Java language on the >>> Java platform.... >> Works but maybe "charged with the evolution and maintenance of the >> Groovy programming language" would be good enough? >> >>> ... There was a remark asking about committers, since we have committers >>> which >>> aren't PMC members. >>> So I figured I could just name them for reference and recognition. >>> Should I remove them?.. >> I think so, such board resolutions only include PMC members. >> >>> ...Going forward (once we're happy with the wording), how should we proceed >>> with the changes? >>> Is it just about mentioning that in the voting thread?.. >> Yes that's fine, I just wanted to avoid polluting that thread with >> discussions. > I was wondering if it would not have been a good idea to ask mentors if > they want to be part of the PMC. I would decline the offer, but some > other might want to be part of the game. Of course, the PMC can vote in > some of the mentors later on if needed. It's just a question... > Ah, seems like Cedric asked the mentors in another trhead : all is good then ;-)
Thanks !
