On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:30AM, Paul King wrote: > Yes it was that discussion which led me to add "should the need arise". But > happy to remove it altogether. I assume it's implicit that the PMC could > enact project specific bylaws if the need arose?
Yup. Although tasking a PMC with mandatory creation of the bylaws is bogus thing. I believe it crept into one of the earlier drafts and they just spread around like wild-fire ;) Cos > On 23 Oct 2015 4:30 am, "Konstantin Boudnik" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ah, I didn't see this thread on time, so here's copy-paste of my comment > > from > > the vote thread: > > > > Let's get rid of > > > > "RESOLVED, that should the need arise for project-specific bylaws, that the > > Apache Groovy PMC be tasked with the creation of such bylaws intended to > > encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache Groovy > > Project; and be it further" > > > > as creating project-special bylaws shouldn't be a requirement for a new > > PMC. > > ASF bylaws are fine for pretty much all of them. There was a lengthy > > discussion > > about it on comdev the other day. > > > > Thanks, > > Cos > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:29AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Here are my comments about the proposed board resolution, let's fix it > > > in this thread. > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Guillaume Laforge <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > ,...to enable > > > > the creation of software using domain-driven design principles, and the > > > > realization of this through the naked objects architectural pattern,.. > > > > > > That's not Groovy, probably a copy/paste from Isis? > > > > > > > ...RESOLVED, that the Apache Groovy Project be and hereby is > > responsible for > > > > the evolution and maintenance of the Groovy programming language; and > > be it > > > > further.. > > > > > > "the evolution and maintenance..." is what you want in that first > > > paragraph probably. > > > > > > > ...As well as the following committers... > > > > > > Board resolutions don't list committers. The PMC is of course free to > > > make those folks committers on the new TLP right away. > > > > > > -Bertrand > >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
