+1. Seems reasonable.
Greg Trasuk
> On Jun 6, 2016, at 10:17 PM, Mike Jumper <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> There were no established guidelines regarding the maintenance of the list
> of support providers when Arcisphere LLC requested that they be added [1].
> We did some basic confirmation and went forward with things, but it would
> be nice to have some actual set procedure to follow for future requests.
>
> Clearly, we can't actually vet providers, as that would be endorsement, but
> I'd think there should be at least some verification regarding claims or
> the list is useless (and potentially spammy).
>
> The following is the criteria we applied when we received the request from
> Arcisphere:
>
> 1) The company appears to exist
> 2) The company agrees to a small neutral blurb, limited to around 50 words
> 3) The company's list of services actually lists Guacamole support as an
> option
>
> [ NOTE: #3 above actually fails for Arcisphere, though they said in the
> original thread that this will be addressed. We'll need to follow up on
> this at some point ... depending on the result of this discussion, of
> course ... ]
>
> Thoughts?
>
> - Mike
>
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a7f9a2415b8c1a598cff25c041adac7c7a4dab792ea452b6b020a997@1464721839@%3Cuser.guacamole.apache.org%3E
