+1

It sounds good to me.

Regards
JB

On 06/07/2016 04:17 AM, Mike Jumper wrote:
Hello all,

There were no established guidelines regarding the maintenance of the list
of support providers when Arcisphere LLC requested that they be added [1].
We did some basic confirmation and went forward with things, but it would
be nice to have some actual set procedure to follow for future requests.

Clearly, we can't actually vet providers, as that would be endorsement, but
I'd think there should be at least some verification regarding claims or
the list is useless (and potentially spammy).

The following is the criteria we applied when we received the request from
Arcisphere:

1) The company appears to exist
2) The company agrees to a small neutral blurb, limited to around 50 words
3) The company's list of services actually lists Guacamole support as an
option

[ NOTE: #3 above actually fails for Arcisphere, though they said in the
original thread that this will be addressed. We'll need to follow up on
this at some point ... depending on the result of this discussion, of
course ... ]

Thoughts?

- Mike

[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a7f9a2415b8c1a598cff25c041adac7c7a4dab792ea452b6b020a997@1464721839@%3Cuser.guacamole.apache.org%3E


--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to