[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13478043#comment-13478043
]
Suraj Menon commented on HAMA-644:
----------------------------------
Updating and replying to the following comment from Apurv:
"Basically I wanted to replace queue with buffer implementation which is
segmented so as to offer more parallelism. I am okay with Suraj's design
also. We'll see which gives better performance and that too if I ever
finish it. :P
--
Regards,
Apurv Verma"
In either case, we are going to use ByteBuffer and I propose we have a reusable
byte array service that provides you a ByteBuffer wrapping a range from that
byte array. Otherwise for every superstep we would be building and tearing down
ByteBuffer objects.
> Messaging Scalability Improvement
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-644
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-644
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: messaging
> Affects Versions: 0.5.0
> Reporter: Thomas Jungblut
> Fix For: 0.6.0
>
> Attachments: HAMA-644_1.patch, HAMA-644_2.patch, HAMA-644_3.patch
>
>
> more details follow soon
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
