[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13526058#comment-13526058
 ] 

Edward J. Yoon edited comment on HAMA-531 at 12/7/12 1:05 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

I think the input partitioning issue should be handled at the BSP framework 
level. But, VertexInputReader hold back possibilities of integration. Since 
user can create their own InputFormatter, I don't think it's important feature.

Moreover, once partitioning-process separated from Graph job, it will make able 
to specify desired number of tasks user want.
                
      was (Author: udanax):
    I think the input partitioning issue should be handled at the BSP framework 
level. But, VertexInputReader hold back possibilities of integration. Since 
user can create their own InputFormatter, I don't think it's important feature.

Moreover, once partitioning-process separated from BSP computation, it will 
make able to specify desired number of tasks for graph job.
                  
> Data re-partitioning in BSPJobClient
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HAMA-531
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-531
>             Project: Hama
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Edward J. Yoon
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: HAMA-531_1.patch, HAMA-531_2.patch, HAMA-531_final.patch
>
>
> The re-partitioning the data is a very expensive operation. By the way, 
> currently, we processes read/write operations sequentially using HDFS api in 
> BSPJobClient from client-side. This causes potential too many open files 
> error, contains HDFS overheads, and shows slow performance.
> We have to find another way to re-partitioning data.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to