You're right. Thanks all. -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
2013. 8. 28., 오후 10:09, Yexi Jiang <[email protected]> 작성: > Mapreduce and BSP are two complemetary computing framework. When facing > non-iterative computing, people prefer to mapreduce, when facing iterative > computing, BSP has its advantage. I agree with Anastasis, we need to > attract people who needs iterative computing to use Hama. > > Regards, > Yexi > > > 2013/8/28 andronat_asf <[email protected]> > >> IMHO BSP can be advertised as a different computing model to MapReduce, >> which means that applications might use BSP as a backbone and you might >> create a different ecosystem around this. You might even get existing big >> projects (e.g. Hive :P) start working on top of Hama. I think the first >> target should be to convince (some how) the projects that already use BSP >> under the hood, to use Hama. I think this is the first step to create a >> different ecosystem. >> >> Kindly, >> Anastasis >> >> On 28 Αυγ 2013, at 11:23 π.μ., Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> IMHO the only thing that makes sense is the latter. >>> Regards, >>> Tommaso >>> >>> 2013/8/28 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> >>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/screenshot1.png >>>> >>>> During drawing the Hadoop ecosystem diagram, one question has arisen. Do >>>> you think we can create the another ecosystem around us in the future? >> or >>>> should we try to live in harmony with already existing projects in >> Hadoop >>>> ecosystem? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>>> @eddieyoon >>>> >> >> > > > -- > ------ > Yexi Jiang, > ECS 251, [email protected] > School of Computer and Information Science, > Florida International University > Homepage: http://users.cis.fiu.edu/~yjian004/
