Great, thank you! I think that makes sense. - Elijah
On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 1:23 PM PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote: > You don't need to use Apache Hamilton everywhere. It's good to start > with Apache Hamilton and in some cases even Apache Hamilton > (incubating). > It is ok to shorten to Hamilton later in the doc. I would generally > use Apache Hamilton in headings but inside paragraphs, it may be > better to use Hamilton - although first reference in the paragraph - > might be best to stick with Apache Hamilton. > > On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 at 21:17, Elijah ben Izzy > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hey! > > > > We're going through all of Hamilton and renaming Hamilton to Apache > > Hamilton (exciting!). I'm curious what the guidance is on when > specifically > > to refer to it as "Apache Hamilton" versus "Hamilton". Take the following > > examples: > > > > 1. Welcome to the documentation for Hamilton! -> Welcome to the > > documentation for Apache Hamilton! (clear-cut) > > 2. What is Hamilton -> What is Apache Hamilton (this seems clear cut as > > well) > > 3. Using Hamilton is all about writing functions. -> Using Apache > Hamilton > > is all about writing functions. (less clear-cut -- not sure the right one > > here) > > 4. # Hamilton Driver (section title in MD docs) -> # Apache Hamilton > Driver > > (this feels a bit awkward to me reading it) > > > > My guess is that it should be Apache Hamilton at the top levels (I.E. > 1,2) > > and in the docs, and Hamilton at the lower levels. (I.E. 3,4), but I'm > > curious what the official recommendations are. > > > > Cheers, > > Elijah >
