You don't need to use Apache Hamilton everywhere. It's good to start with Apache Hamilton and in some cases even Apache Hamilton (incubating). It is ok to shorten to Hamilton later in the doc. I would generally use Apache Hamilton in headings but inside paragraphs, it may be better to use Hamilton - although first reference in the paragraph - might be best to stick with Apache Hamilton.
On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 at 21:17, Elijah ben Izzy <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey! > > We're going through all of Hamilton and renaming Hamilton to Apache > Hamilton (exciting!). I'm curious what the guidance is on when specifically > to refer to it as "Apache Hamilton" versus "Hamilton". Take the following > examples: > > 1. Welcome to the documentation for Hamilton! -> Welcome to the > documentation for Apache Hamilton! (clear-cut) > 2. What is Hamilton -> What is Apache Hamilton (this seems clear cut as > well) > 3. Using Hamilton is all about writing functions. -> Using Apache Hamilton > is all about writing functions. (less clear-cut -- not sure the right one > here) > 4. # Hamilton Driver (section title in MD docs) -> # Apache Hamilton Driver > (this feels a bit awkward to me reading it) > > My guess is that it should be Apache Hamilton at the top levels (I.E. 1,2) > and in the docs, and Hamilton at the lower levels. (I.E. 3,4), but I'm > curious what the official recommendations are. > > Cheers, > Elijah
