Can at least try it out with tests to see what breaks! Our tests are extremely comprehensive so I feel quite confident if they pass. Will take a stab at it.
On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 8:30 PM Stefan Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote: > @charles yeah we might need to see what would be needed to make use of free > threaded python. Do we have any design assumptions that would make it hard > to adopt (we do have the fallback of the multithreaded executor/adapter > though that should enable this easily). > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 4:38 PM cswartzvi (via GitHub) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > cswartzvi commented on PR #1411: > > URL: > https://github.com/apache/hamilton/pull/1411#issuecomment-3420058618 > > > > @elijahbenizzy I am very excited for this! What do you think about > > including freethreaded python in the actions matrix (`3.13t`)? Maybe we > are > > not ready to go on record as supporting free threading, but it might be > > nice to keep an eye on it. What do you think? > > > > > > -- > > This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. > > To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the > > URL above to go to the specific comment. > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: > > [email protected] > > > > >
