I ran the tests last night and tried a couple of contrived examples with the `MultiThreadingExecutor` - nothing broke out of the box. FYI I also tried `3.14t` (not suggesting that yet) and that also seemed to work, although there are some expected dependency issues. -- *Charles W. Swartz VI, Ph.D.* Senior Operations Research Analyst Email: [email protected] Cell: 1-215-479-3249
On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 11:30 AM Elijah ben Izzy < [email protected]> wrote: > Can at least try it out with tests to see what breaks! Our tests are > extremely comprehensive so I feel quite confident if they pass. Will take a > stab at it. > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 8:30 PM Stefan Krawczyk <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > @charles yeah we might need to see what would be needed to make use of > free > > threaded python. Do we have any design assumptions that would make it > hard > > to adopt (we do have the fallback of the multithreaded executor/adapter > > though that should enable this easily). > > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 4:38 PM cswartzvi (via GitHub) <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > cswartzvi commented on PR #1411: > > > URL: > > https://github.com/apache/hamilton/pull/1411#issuecomment-3420058618 > > > > > > @elijahbenizzy I am very excited for this! What do you think about > > > including freethreaded python in the actions matrix (`3.13t`)? Maybe we > > are > > > not ready to go on record as supporting free threading, but it might be > > > nice to keep an eye on it. What do you think? > > > > > > > > > -- > > > This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. > > > To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the > > > URL above to go to the specific comment. > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > >
