Mikhail Loenko wrote:
I'm ok with that timeline. We probably need goals for "dotted"
releases also (like 5.1 where we can improve for example performance)
Absolutely - I'm not suggesting that list was operational and complete,
but simply a basic "storyline" for the project.
geir
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/11/27, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I noticed that I've said the following several times, and it's really
not for me to say, but for us to say.
Does anyone have a problem with the following "high-level" time line?
Mid 2007 : Java SE 5
End 2007 : Java SE 6 (meaning we have to start thinking about Java SE 6
classlib changes...)
End 2008 : Java SE 7 (this really means "we'll do Java SE 7 when Sun
does Java SE 7...")
geir
