Does it make use of "patch_available"? It seems to be a very important field for committers :)
Regards, 2006/12/6, Ivaschenko, Aleksei V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks! It's a good idea to classify classlib bugs by module names. I'll do that in next update. Tony Wu wrote: >Good job! >So many unresloved bugs. Seems there is a long way to go. >I have a suggestion but not the requirement. What about classify the >classlib related issuses by module name, accoding to the JIRA title. >You know, the title follows the format [classlib][modulename]Content. > >On 12/6/06, Ivaschenko, Aleksei V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I've updated scripts for generating indicators of unresolved Harmony >> bugs: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2359 >> >> Now scripts can generate separate indicators for "Classlib", "DRLVM", >> "VM" and "Contributions" Harmony components showing the proportions of >> their unresolved bugs by priority. Find the examples of indicators on >> wiki page: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unresolved_Bugs_History
-- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
