Alexey Petrenko wrote: > 2007/1/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> so what do we do? I'm hoping that we can find a way to achieve this >> w/o us having to have "shadow" or duplicate code here... > That would be great. Can you suggest something?
As Alexey wrote, the level of CORBA support in the RI 5.0 [1] is predominantly 2.3.1 based. However, we are free to implement a later version of the Corba spec and still be compliant since the CORBA code is an "endorsed standard" (see [2]). In this case I suggest we support Yoko in their goal of implementing corba 2.4 (and ignore the JAPI diffs). [1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/idl/compliance.html [2] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/README.html Regards, Tim
