(you may want to report this new topic in a new thread)
Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > I run the failed Math tests and got a litle bit strange results: > these 3 tests passed on the runtime built by DRLVM build and failed on > the runtime built by federated build. ie the command: > ant test -Dbuild.module=luni > -Dtest.jre.home=projects/trunk/working_vm/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_release/deploy/jdk/jre/ > > -Dtest.case=org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.StrictMathTest > > leads to the message: > [junit] Tests run: 44, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.335 sec > [junit] Test org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.StrictMathTest > FAILED > > while command: > ant test -Dbuild.module=luni > -Dtest.jre.home=projects/drlvm/trunk/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_release/deploy/jdk/jre/ > > -Dtest.case=org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.StrictMathTest > > leads to the message: > [junit] Running org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.StrictMathTest > [junit] Tests run: 44, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.332 sec > > Both runtimes report one version: > svn = r550333, (Jun 26 2007), Linux/ia32/gcc 3.3.3, release build > > Could someone from DRLVM-build gurus look at this issue? > > thanks, Vladimir > > On 6/26/07, Ivan Popov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> As I mentioned above, it is known failure, not a regression. It's safe >> to add it to exclude list and ignore for now. >> >> Thanks. >> Ivan (jdwp person) >> >> On 6/26/07, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Stepan Mishura wrote: >> > > On 6/26/07, Stepan Mishura wrote: >> > >> On 6/25/07, Ivan Popov wrote: >> > >> > I see two failures of jdktools tests, which are not new ones. >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> Ivan, >> > >> >> > >> Thanks for prompt failure analysis. I'm going to add >> HoldEventsTest to >> > >> exclude list for intermittent failures on Linux, increase timeout >> and >> > >> re-run tests. >> > > >> > > Ops, sorry ... I've updated the exclude list without getting >> agreement >> > > from another committer. Please let me know if there any objections >> for >> > > updating the exclude list. >> > >> > It would be good to hear from a VM/jdwp person whether this is a >> > regression that needs to be fixed, or whether it is safe to ignore it >> > for now. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Tim >> > >> >
