OK, looking through the federated build I found the difference between my 'DRLVM' build and federated one. In the first case 'classlib' was built in the 'debug' mode. When classlib was rebuilt with -Dhy.cfg=release option the StrictMathTest failed on this build too. So we should look at the differences between classlib 'debug' and 'release' build modes to find the reason of these test failure.
thanks, Vladimir On 6/26/07, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I run the failed Math tests and got a litle bit strange results: these 3 tests passed on the runtime built by DRLVM build and failed on the runtime built by federated build. ie the command: ant test -Dbuild.module=luni -Dtest.jre.home=projects/trunk/working_vm/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_release/deploy/jdk/jre/ -Dtest.case=org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.StrictMathTest leads to the message: [junit] Tests run: 44, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.335 sec [junit] Test org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.StrictMathTest FAILED while command: ant test -Dbuild.module=luni -Dtest.jre.home=projects/drlvm/trunk/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_release/deploy/jdk/jre/ -Dtest.case=org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.StrictMathTest leads to the message: [junit] Running org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.StrictMathTest [junit] Tests run: 44, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.332 sec Both runtimes report one version: svn = r550333, (Jun 26 2007), Linux/ia32/gcc 3.3.3, release build Could someone from DRLVM-build gurus look at this issue? thanks, Vladimir On 6/26/07, Ivan Popov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I mentioned above, it is known failure, not a regression. It's safe > to add it to exclude list and ignore for now. > > Thanks. > Ivan (jdwp person) > > On 6/26/07, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Stepan Mishura wrote: > > > On 6/26/07, Stepan Mishura wrote: > > >> On 6/25/07, Ivan Popov wrote: > > >> > I see two failures of jdktools tests, which are not new ones. > > >> > > > >> > > >> Ivan, > > >> > > >> Thanks for prompt failure analysis. I'm going to add HoldEventsTest to > > >> exclude list for intermittent failures on Linux, increase timeout and > > >> re-run tests. > > > > > > Ops, sorry ... I've updated the exclude list without getting agreement > > > from another committer. Please let me know if there any objections for > > > updating the exclude list. > > > > It would be good to hear from a VM/jdwp person whether this is a > > regression that needs to be fixed, or whether it is safe to ignore it > > for now. > > > > Regards, > > Tim > > >
