2007/7/20, Spark Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2007/7/20, Yang Paulex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> 2007/7/20, Spark Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > 2007/7/19, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >:
> > >
> > > Yeah, thanks, this one is nice. :) I was waiting for the link to
> some
> > > piece of code indeed but does not matter. I've found an example in
> the
> > > patch you submitted for HARMONY-4473. I wonder why didn't we need
> this
> > > before? Perhaps all our previous persistence delegates were too
> simple
> > > - there was no PDs for collection types.
> > >
> > > Anyway, I agree that it would be more convenient to place
> persistence
> > > delegates to "java.beans" directly. However, in this case *all* our
> > > PDs should be moved to this package IMO.
> >
> >
> > Yes, under this situation, all of them should be moved.
> >
> > In the beginning, I wanted to use as much as existing contribution, so
> I
> > left some in o.a.h.beans, package. As things going on, It turns out
> that
> > move to java.beans package is a better choice now.
>
>
> Very nice, so would you provide a patch on this? Or I can deal
> with it
> myself.
I plan to provide a patch. But if you already have one, I can use yours.
I have created a JIRA for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4504
And thanks for your help so far.
>
>
>
>
> With Best Regards,
> > >
> > > 2007/7/19, Spark Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > 2007/7/19, Alexei Zakharov < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > In awt related persistence delegates, I need to do a check
> first:
> > > > > > 1 .PersistenceDelegate pd = enc.getPersistenceDelegate(
> > > oldVal.getClass
> > > > > ());
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2. if (!pd.mutatesTo(oldVal, newVal)) {
> > > > > > // Do something here.
> > > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you mean here, that oldVal, newVal and pd are completely
> > unrelated
> > > > > to the persistence delegate that encapsulates this logic? Just
> try
> > to
> > > > > guess why do you need this - access methods of one persistence
> > > > > delegate from another persistence delegate. Can you show the
> > complete
> > > > > context of this?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Initialize method is used to
> > > > <cite from Java Doc>
> > > > Produce a series of statements with side effects on newInstance so
> > that
> > > the
> > > > new instance becomes *equivalent* to oldInstance.
> > > > </cite from Java Doc>
> > > >
> > > > In my implementation, oldVal is some property get from oldInstance
> and
> > > > newVal is the corresponding property of the newInstance. If oldVal
> &
> > > newVal
> > > > is mutable, oldVal will be set to newInstance and replace newVal.
> > That's
> > > how
> > > > the side effects work.
> > > >
> > > > Delegate used to check mutability for oldVal & newVal most likely
> is
> > not
> > > the
> > > > same as that for oldInstance & newInstance, so get the delegate on
> the
> > > fly
> > > > is needed.
> > > >
> > > > Will this explaination be OK this time? : - )
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > 2007/7/18, Spark Shen < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > > 2007/7/18, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Spark,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As you can see, put these delegates into o.a.h.beanspackage
> > > would
> > > > > > > result in
> > > > > > > > tweaked code.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sorry, looks like I miss your idea. Do we need to call some
> > > > > > > package-protected methods here? Could you please explain in
> more
> > > > > > > details?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OK, sorry for not explain myself clearly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In awt related persistence delegates, I need to do a check
> first:
> > > > > > 1 .PersistenceDelegate pd = enc.getPersistenceDelegate(
> > > oldVal.getClass
> > > > > ());
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2. if (!pd.mutatesTo(oldVal, newVal)) {
> > > > > > // Do something here.
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As you can see, in the first step, I get the persistence
> delegate
> > > for
> > > > > old
> > > > > > value. And in the 2nd step, if this delegate says old value
> and
> > new
> > > > > value
> > > > > > are mutable, then I will do something. But mutatesTo method
> > invoked
> > > in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > if statement is a protected method, if I put awt delegates
> into
> > > > > > o.a.h.beanspackage, I need to do many extra work to implement
> > > similar
> > > > > > logic as above,
> > > > > > and the result code may become complex and ugly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Based on that, I prefer to move those delegates in
> o.a.h.beansinto
> > > > > > java.beans.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2007/7/18, Spark Shen < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > > > > 2007/7/18, Yang Paulex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Spark,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I noticed that you were working at the persistent
> delegation
> > > > > > > > > implementations
> > > > > > > > > recently, thanks for this enhancement.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I am now adding persistence delegate for some classes of
> awt
> > > > > package.
> > > > > > > > Please refer to HY-4473 for detailed information.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But I'm a little confused on this
> > > > > > > > > patch and some others before, seems you are adding the
> > > > > implementations
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > java.beans package, but in our former implementations,
> there
> > > are
> > > > > some
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > primitive types in o.a.h.beans, I suppose they are
> actually
> > > stuffs
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > same
> > > > > > > > > category, so does it make sense to make them in same
> > package?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I planed to put all the persistence delegates into
> > > o.a.h.beanspackage,
> > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > encounter problem. Persistence delegate of awt classes
> need to
> > > first
> > > > > > > check
> > > > > > > > whether target value and new value will be mutable, as
> below：
> > > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > > PersistenceDelegate pd = enc
> > > > > > > > .getPersistenceDelegate(targetVal.getClass());
> > > > > > > > if (!pd.mutatesTo(targetVal, newVal)) {
> > > > > > > > Statement setterStm = new Statement(oldInstance,
> "add",
> > new
> > > > > Object[]
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > oldVal });
> > > > > > > > enc.writeStatement(setterStm);
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > </snip>
> > > > > > > > As you can see, put these delegates into o.a.h.beanspackage
> > > would
> > > > > > > result in
> > > > > > > > tweaked code.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I agree to put all delegates into one place. Since that
> way,
> > > code
> > > > > would
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > more readable. And given the awt delegates implementation,
> my
> > > > > preferred
> > > > > > > > destination is java.beans package.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2007/7/18, spark shen (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>
> > > > > > > > > ]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > spark shen updated HARMONY-4473:
> > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Attachment: HY-4473.patch
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > [classlib][beans] Current bean implementation does
> not
> > > persist
> > > > > > > > > > awt.Choice properly
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Key: HARMONY-4473
> > > > > > > > > > > URL:
> > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4473
> > > > > > > > > > > Project: Harmony
> > > > > > > > > > > Issue Type: Bug
> > > > > > > > > > > Components: Classlib
> > > > > > > > > > > Reporter: spark shen
> > > > > > > > > > > Assignee: Tony Wu
> > > > > > > > > > > Attachments: HY-4473.patch, HY-4473.sh
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The following test case will throw
> StackOverflowError on
> > > > > Harmony
> > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > > pass on RI:
> > > > > > > > > > > public void test_writeObject_java_awt_Choice() {
> > > > > > > > > > > ByteArrayOutputStream byteArrayOutputStream
> =
> > new
> > > > > > > > > > ByteArrayOutputStream();
> > > > > > > > > > > XMLEncoder encoder = new XMLEncoder(new
> > > > > > > BufferedOutputStream(
> > > > > > > > > > > byteArrayOutputStream));
> > > > > > > > > > > Choice choice = new Choice();
> > > > > > > > > > > encoder.writeObject(choice);
> > > > > > > > > > > encoder.close();
> > > > > > > > > > > DataInputStream stream = new
> DataInputStream(new
> > > > > > > > > > ByteArrayInputStream(
> > > > > > > > > > > byteArrayOutputStream.toByteArray
> ()));
> > > > > > > > > > > XMLDecoder decoder = new XMLDecoder(stream);
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Choice aChoice = (Choice) decoder.readObject
> ();
> > > > > > > > > > > assertEquals(
> choice.getFocusTraversalKeysEnabled
> > > (),
> > > > > > > aChoice
> > > > > > > > > > > .getFocusTraversalKeysEnabled());
> > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > Besides Choice, the awt classes need special
> treatment
> > > are:
> > > > > > > > > > > SystemColor,
> > > > > > > > > > > TextAttribute,
> > > > > > > > > > > MenuShortcut,
> > > > > > > > > > > awt.Component,
> > > > > > > > > > > awt.Container,
> > > > > > > > > > > Menu,
> > > > > > > > > > > MenuBar,
> > > > > > > > > > > awt.List,
> > > > > > > > > > > BorderLayout,
> > > > > > > > > > > CardLayout,
> > > > > > > > > > > GridLayout,
> > > > > > > > > > > Insets,
> > > > > > > > > > > Point,
> > > > > > > > > > > ScrollPane
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the
> issue
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alexei Zakharov,
> > > Intel ESSD
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Spark Shen
> > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Paulex Yang
> China Software Development laboratory
> IBM
>
--
Spark Shen
China Software Development Lab, IBM
--
Spark Shen
China Software Development Lab, IBM
