Alexey Petrenko wrote:
2007/9/4, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
It seems to be a bug in verifier, but there weren't any changes in
verifier recently, so I am not sure it is a regression. Probably this
bug was hidden and didn't show up until recently.
BTW, building DRLVM with -Duse_original_verifier=true allows eclipse 3.3
to start. I think that maybe switching back to older verifier again
might improve the situation.
Yes, this helps. -noverify should also help in this case.
I've created HARMONY-4738 to track the issue.
It would be nice if someone familiar with the verifier could fix the issue.
BTW I think I've found out the reason for this bug. Eclipse 3.3 has an
ICU4J implementation bundled with it. It uses ICU 3.6.1 while we have
ICU4J 3.4.4 in bootclasspath.
In this case ICU classes are loaded from our 3.4.4 JAR file except for
some classes that may not be present in the older version. In this case
they are taken from Eclipse's JAR file which leads to inconsistencies.
I wonder why older verifier implementation works ok...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4738
2007/9/4, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Yes, looks like we really have a regression.
I've tried Eclipse with M2 and recent classlib with j9 and works in
both cases. But silently crashes silently in the very beging. Even
without trace in configuration directory.
So we need to investigate the issue.
Any help is welcome :)
SY, Alexey
2007/9/4, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Leo Li wrote:
On 9/4/07, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Guys,
I've tried to run In Harmony with Eclipse bundle on the recent
harmony/drlvm build but it crashes silently in the very begining.
I would say that this is very serious regression for us.
I'll continue investigation but it would be nice if someone will try
to investigate it in the same time.
Thanks in advance.
SY, Alexey
Yes, it is a serious regression. And do you know when it start to
fail?
I will try it when I go to office tomorrow since I have no classlib
on hand. Not sure whether I can help.:)
FYI: It's working ok for me on the current HEAD of classlib (r572680)
with the IBM VME.
Regards,
Tim
--
Gregory
--
Gregory
