Yes, it works fine now. SY, Alexey
2007/9/12, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi > > Sorry for my silence, I was out for a while. > > Has this been resolved? The functionality Alexei was talking > about is similar in two verifiers and Alexei's change actually rolls back > some of my August changes (which fixed a bug), so if regression > tests run smoothly, it's probably OK > > Thanks, > Mikhail > > 2007/9/6, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 9/6/07, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So the new verifier has this issue from the very begining? And this is > > > not a regression, right? > > > > > > Does anybody know when new verifier was commited? > > > > > > > $ svn log build/make/components/vm/vmcore.xml > > > > <SNIP> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > r563766 | mloenko | 2007-08-08 13:24:26 +0700 (Wed, 08 Aug 2007) | 1 line > > > > switching default verifier to 3363 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > r563025 | mloenko | 2007-08-06 11:55:57 +0700 (Mon, 06 Aug 2007) | 1 line > > > > switching the verifiers back until newly found issues are resolved > > > > <SNIP> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > r556809 | mloenko | 2007-07-17 11:36:45 +0700 (Tue, 17 Jul 2007) | 1 line > > > > switching default verifier to HARMONY-3363 > > > > <SNIP> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > r556523 | mloenko | 2007-07-16 13:44:55 +0700 (Mon, 16 Jul 2007) | 1 line > > > > integration of HARMONY-3363 (contribution of alternative bytecode > > verifier). Default behavior not switched yet > > > > -Stepan. > > >
