Rana Dasgupta wrote: > If we were to add > x86-64 to M3, it would be under disclaimer only( it's a late decision, > and it looks relatively good ), we can't claim that that it has the > stability of the 32 bit distributions.
Our milestones are taken to be stable builds of our current functionality; if the stability has not yet been achieved then I think it is fine to keep publishing x86-64 as "snapshot" builds. Making that platform a 'milestone build with disclaimers' just makes the meaning of milestones confusing IMHO. If we are close to achieving x86-64 stability then having a short cycle to include it in an M4 might make sense. Regards, Tim
