On 9/27/07, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rana Dasgupta wrote: > > If we were to add > > x86-64 to M3, it would be under disclaimer only( it's a late decision, > > and it looks relatively good ), we can't claim that that it has the > > stability of the 32 bit distributions. > > Our milestones are taken to be stable builds of our current > functionality; if the stability has not yet been achieved then I think > it is fine to keep publishing x86-64 as "snapshot" builds. Making that > platform a 'milestone build with disclaimers' just makes the meaning of > milestones confusing IMHO. > > If we are close to achieving x86-64 stability then having a short cycle > to include it in an M4 might make sense. >
Makes sense, it does create some ambiguity between milestone and snapshot builds. We can try in M4. Thanks, Rana > Regards, > Tim > > > >
