Hi Vladimir, This makes sense. The only concern from my side is that the table may look too cluttered. Actually we may completely switch to revisions instead of dates - what do you think?
-- Alexey 2007/10/17, Vladimir Beliaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Alexey, > > currently the Code Integrity Status page contains the date when the > regression happen, like: > > "JDKTools tests" "12:01 since 2007-09-26" > > This information is proposed to be kept, also let's add a latest revision > which PASSED for this suite, i.e. let's have something like: > > "JDKTools tests" "12:01 since 2007-09-26, last passed > r556677" > > Let's have it done for all suites for Code Integrity testing. Such an > improvement would simplyfy the search of "bad patch" introducing regression > and improve "no regression" tracking process. > > [1]: http://people.apache.org/~varlax/harmony-integrity/ > Thanks > -- > Vladimir Beliaev > Intel Middleware Products Division >
