I see on the CI page (for DRLVM tests): 09:01<http://people.apache.org/%7Evarlax/harmony-integrity/windows_x86/drlvm-test> since 2007-10-18 last passed r585894
It looks pretty accurate and it is what required... Thanks Vladimir Beliaev 2007/10/19, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 2007/10/19, Vladimir Beliaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 2007/10/19, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Vladimir Beliaev wrote: > > > > I like the date - they indicate the "human factor" like "there is a > > > > regression 2 days already and nobody cares". And a revision is a > > > "technical > > > > help" for someone who evaluates the regression. > > > > > > > > So I would show both first-failure-data and last-success-revision on > CI > > > page > > > > (if it is possible). > > > > > > Either way works for me. > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > So let's keep it as "12:01 since 2007-09-26, last passed r556677". > > Currently I hacked the script to display as "10:17 / r586285 > since 2007-10-12 / r522334", but page looks quite verbose. The > compromise you suggest should be better ;) > > > > > Thanks > > Vladimir Beliaev >
