Sounds a good idea. +1. Actually, I have the similar thinking[1] several days ago. I just thought about publish more test results. For example coverage report,
unit test report etc. on our web site. The idea is to prove harmony is in a great shape. IMO, coverage and unit test is especially import for a project such as harmony - with huge code base and fundamental functions. Maven project has a similar link on its web site[2], with different kinds of test reports published. How about we extend out performance link[3] to a similar form? I departured from your original idea a little, do I? :-) [1]http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.harmony.devel/29632 [2] http://maven.apache.org/ref/current/maven-model/project-reports.html [3] http://harmony.apache.org/performance.html 18 Oct 2007 18:51:16 +0400, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Folks, > > ..just thinking.. would be really nice to have Harmony/DRLVM > SPECjbb2005 results published officially on spec.org (!!!) given the > number of performance work recently, I believe in good results right > from the start (and I believe in perf improvements:) > > IMHO, it should help Harmony to gain interest from enterprise vendors > (I mean, those nice people who do not pay attention to DaCapo scores > for some (unknown) reason) > > the funniest thing is that according to [1] non-profit cost is > non-zero for some (unknown) reason and looks like $125. But since > Apache is a real NON PROFIT, Apache does not pay even 2c, right? > > I wonder how Apache cooks things like that? > > > [1] http://www.spec.org/order.html > > -- > Egor Pasko > > -- Spark Shen China Software Development Lab, IBM
