On 10/19/07, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is what I was thinking about as well. > > Non-profit/educational license for JBB2005 is 125$ [1] > > But some logistics is not clear for me: > > Though it's possible that one can buy it and grant to ASF, it's not clear > who in ASF has authority to accept the grant > > It's also not clear who will then be able to use the SPEC and how we will > maintain this "USER will not permit any third party to use or copy the > original or any copy thereof. In the event of unauthorized transfer or > copying, USER will pay SPEC a penalty in the amount of one additional > fee for each such transfer or copy." from [2] > > The third thing that's not clear for me is who should approve submitting > the results and behalf of Apache Harmony. >
I think these questions should be addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Stepan. > Thanks, > Mikhail > > [1] http://www.spec.org/order.html > [2] http://www.spec.org/spec/docs/sample_license_agreement.pdf > > 18 Oct 2007 18:51:16 +0400, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Folks, > > > > ..just thinking.. would be really nice to have Harmony/DRLVM > > SPECjbb2005 results published officially on spec.org (!!!) given the > > number of performance work recently, I believe in good results right > > from the start (and I believe in perf improvements:) > > > > IMHO, it should help Harmony to gain interest from enterprise vendors > > (I mean, those nice people who do not pay attention to DaCapo scores > > for some (unknown) reason) > > > > the funniest thing is that according to [1] non-profit cost is > > non-zero for some (unknown) reason and looks like $125. But since > > Apache is a real NON PROFIT, Apache does not pay even 2c, right? > > > > I wonder how Apache cooks things like that? > > > > > > [1] http://www.spec.org/order.html > > > > -- > > Egor Pasko
