Tim, On Nov 21, 2007 9:21 PM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see, that makes sense. So perhaps we should not bother with the > current basing option in makefiles, and just leave it all to the > deployment stage? We might just leave them alone and rebase again on the deployment stage. That's the minumim change which allows to use large heaps.
> Looking at the doc for editbin, I agree that /largeaddressaware looks > like a good option too. How about /bind ? Given we just rebased the > DLLs it may help with start-up times? That makes sense for the sake of modularity, sure, but that's not the post-build action since we don't know what libraries will be used exactly. So we need to prepare for the worst case and relocate most of them. > I may tweak that patch a bit so it doesn't try to rebase the DLLs in the > bin/default directory if the VM isn't DRLVM. Not sure what the effect > would be on the IBM VME (at least, some of those files don't appear in > the IBM/BEA VM). Uhm... I thought my patch only touches DRLVM-specific build code. Are the same scripts used for Harmony/J9 building? If yes, sure, we can ensure compatibility with other VMs as well. Thanks, Aleksey.
