On Nov 21, 2007 10:56 PM, Aleksey Shipilev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Looking at the doc for editbin, I agree that /largeaddressaware looks > > >> like a good option too. How about /bind ? Given we just rebased the > > >> DLLs it may help with start-up times? > > > That makes sense for the sake of modularity, sure, but that's not the > > > post-build action since we don't know what libraries will be used > > > exactly. So we need to prepare for the worst case and relocate most of > > > them. > > Are we talking about the same thing. If I read /bind properly it > > preloads the addresses of entry points assuming that the DLLs do not > > conflict -- which we hope will be true after rebasing. > Good shot, I've missed the point there. I would spend some time for > studying /BIND behavior and come up with the result a bit later. So I haven't any boosts/degradations on HWA, but updated the patch with /BIND. Hopefully it will help someday :) Please see JIRA for updated patch.
Thanks, Aleksey, ESSD, Intel
